A new chapter has unfolded in the ongoing controversy surrounding late-night host Jimmy Kimmel, who was recently fired by ABC after making negative comments about politician Charlie Kirk. The firing itself sent shockwaves through the entertainment and political worlds, but the situation escalated further when outspoken Fox News host Jeanine Pirro weighed in with a passionate on-air condemnation.

During a live broadcast, Pirro did not hold back. She sharply criticized Kimmel, referring to him as a “gay talk show host,” and accused him of using his platform to “spread hate on the microphone.” Pirro went even further, calling on her fans and viewers nationwide to boycott Kimmel, stating:
“Those who use the stage to spread hate on the microphone do not deserve to have an audience or to exist in America. We need to get rid of the toxic things that are poisoning our culture.”

Jeanine Pirro shuts down reporters questioning Trump’s DC crime crackdown

Pirro’s remarks quickly ignited a cultural firestorm. Social media platforms lit up with heated debates, with supporters praising her for “standing up to Hollywood hypocrisy,” while critics accused her of intolerance and fueling division. The hashtag #BoycottKimmel began trending, and both sides of the political spectrum weighed in on the broader implications for free speech and celebrity accountability.

Kimmel, who has long been known for his sharp wit and political satire, has not yet publicly responded to Pirro’s comments or his firing. ABC, meanwhile, has remained tight-lipped about the specifics of his dismissal, stating only that the network “does not condone hate speech or personal attacks.”

FirstFT: Trump ally Charlie Kirk shot dead in Utah

The controversy has sparked a wider conversation about the boundaries of humor, the responsibilities of public figures, and the role of media in shaping political discourse. For some, Kimmel’s firing and Pirro’s subsequent comments represent a necessary reckoning for celebrities who cross the line. For others, it’s a disturbing sign of cancel culture run amok and an attack on freedom of expression.

As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: the intersection of politics, entertainment, and media remains as volatile as ever. Whether Kimmel will find another platform—or whether Pirro’s boycott will gain traction—remains to be seen.